Subscribe to Gifts and Dec
RSS
Email

Share this on
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

More on Peter Drucker and “What business are we in?”

September 25, 2009

I recently blogged about Peter Drucker’s famous question: “What business are you in?” Drucker, the brilliant business philosopher, used to ask this “naïve” question because he found that many businesspeople had a mistaken notion. Case in point being the railroad industry that lost out to air travel because it thought it was in the railroad business when it was in fact in the travel business. The implication being, that if you don’t know what business you are truly in you really can’t know who your competition is. 

I proposed that the toy industry was in the play business rather than the toy business and that, therefore, competition came from any entity that provided play, whether it be a video game company, an amusement park or even a playground.

I was approached by a reader who said: “I’m going to admit I’m not exactly seeing the implications you are for being a "play" company versus a "toy" company…How would toymaker’s business be different it were a "play" company?”

Good question! Here is my answer:

When Nolan Bushnell approached the toy industry in the 1970’s with the first at home video game “Pong” he was turned away. Why, because it was not deemed a toy. As a result, a new industry was born, “Video Games,” and the toy industry has suffered the consequences ever since.

What if the toy manufacturers who were approached recognized that they were in the same industry as Bushnell, the “Play Industry,” and that what he and they were producing was the same thing: Vehicles for play? They would have included video gaming into their mix of products and it would be Hasbro, Mattel or some other toy companies rather than Nintendo, Electronic Arts or Activision that would be generating untold revenues. 

What does this mean for the toy industry going forward? Here are just three thoughts:

·         Keep your eyes out for any new product opportunity that can deliver play. If it does, then it should at least be considered for inclusion in a toy company’s product portfolio.

·         Keep your eyes out for any company that is delivering play. If they are, they are your competition. Create strategies and tactics to compete with them for the consumer dollar.

·         If a stranger approaches you with a new and exotic idea for a play delivery system, don’t automatically turn them away. Your company and the industry can use the new blood and the new ideas.

What differences do you think it would make if the toy industry thought of itself in the play rather than toy industries?

Posted by Richard Gottlieb on September 25, 2009 | Comments (3)

October 15, 2009
In response to: More on Peter Drucker and “What business are we in?”
Mary Couzin commented:

I also agree with this idea and posted my remarks on Richard's previous blog about his topic. In our endeavor for the media and public to give our industry more attention, one of our many events is the Toy and Game Inventor of the Year Awards, tagieawards.com, to promote our inventors as actors/authors/chefs are promoted. This year we cross over into other entertainment segments and are excited to have Daryl Hannah and Hilary Shepard, the actresses and inventors of the board game Liebrary, as Presenters at the Awards Dinner and they are autographing games at our Chicago Toy and Game Fair. In addition, John Ratzenberger is also getting involved this year and going forward. We need to make our segment of the entertainment industry more cool and put faces on our products. Faces sell.


October 14, 2009
In response to: More on Peter Drucker and “What business are we in?”
Sandford Tuey commented:

I agree totally Richard. Hence the name Playdigm. Toys, playthings, board games, figurines, coloring books, novels, comics, movies, video games, sports and every other thing that children and adults do to entertain themselves is a derivative of the entertainment industry. So 'play' is a part of entertaining oneself and others but truly falls within the entertainment industry. Therefore all of the above segments of the toy and play environments compete against all the other entertainment sectors. We are all in the entertainment industry and that is why we are seeing so many movies (90 minute commercials) to help market brand related toys. We will see more and more of this interconnected entertainment, I guarantee it! Sandford Tuey www.Playdigm.com A Shift in Entertainment


October 14, 2009
In response to: More on Peter Drucker and “What business are we in?”
Sandford Tuey commented:

I agree totally Robert. Hence the name Playdigm. Toys, playthings, board games, figurines, coloring books, novels, comics, movies, video games, sports and every other thing that children and adults do to entertain themselves is a derivative of the entertainment industry. So 'play' is a part of entertaining oneself and others but truly falls within the entertainment industry. Therefore all of the above segments of the toy and play environments compete against all the other entertainment sectors. We are all in the entertainment industry and that is why we are seeing so many movies (90 minute commercials) to help market brand related toys. We will see more and more of this interconnected entertainment, I guarantee it! Sandford Tuey www.Playdigm.com A Shift in Entertainment

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Atlanta Virtual Tours
Advertisement
REA-TIXSales-160x160
NEWSLETTERS
eletter_callout_box_GDA


About Us   |   Advertise   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Industry Links   |   RSS
© 2012 Sandow Media LLC.All rights reserved.
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy